I'm trying to create an animated plot but my code is very slow, perhaps the method I'm using is too naive. In the below example, I have 4 subplots each with 3 lines, which I update in a 'time' loop.
clc;clear;close all;
state = {'$x-Position$','$x-Velocity$','$y-Position$','$y-Velocity$'};
ylabels = {'$x$','$\dot{x}$','$y$','$\dot{y}$'};
options1 = {'interpreter','latex'};
options2 = {'interpreter','latex','fontsize',20};
maxT = 300;
for pp = 1:4
hh1(pp)=subplot(2,2,pp);
xlabel('$t$',options2{:});
ylabel(ylabels{pp},options2{:});
title(state{pp},options1{:})
xlim([0 maxT])
hold on
end
x = randn(4,300);
z = randn(4,300);
x_est = randn(4,300);
for k = 2:maxT
for p = 1:4
plot(hh1(p),k-1:k,x(p,k-1:k),'b','linewidth',2)
plot(hh1(p),k-1:k,z(p,k-1:k),'m')
plot(hh1(p),k-1:k,x_est(p,k-1:k),':k','linewidth',2)
end
drawnow;
end
As can be seen from the profiler output, the drawnow
is killing the time. Is there any way I can be more efficient in creating this animation?
Because you want an animation, there is no alternative to using drawnow
to update the frame. However, it's not drawnow
in particular which is slowing you down - the profiler can be misleading... drawnow
simply updates all of the graphics changes since the last re-draw, which in your case is a dozen new plots!
You'll find that hold
is pretty slowing. For instance if you're wiser about your holding, remove the existing hold on
and only hold when actually plotting
% ... above code the same but without 'hold on'
for p = 1:4
hold(hh1(p), 'on');
% plots
hold(hh1(p), 'off');
end
This saves ~10% time on my PC (12.3sec down to 11.3sec).
The real speed up comes from removing hold
entirely, along with all of the individual plot
calls! This method also doesn't touch the line formatting which will help with speed. See a previous question about updating plot data here.
Simply update the plot data instead of adding plots. This gives me a speedup of ~68% (12.3sec down to 4.0sec).
% ... your same setup
% Initialise plot data
x = randn(4,300);
z = randn(4,300);
x_est = randn(4,300);
plts = cell(4,3);
hh1 = cell(4,1);
% Loop over subplots and initialise plot lines
for p = 1:4
hh1{p}=subplot(2,2,p);
xlabel('$t$',options2{:});
ylabel(ylabels{p},options2{:});
title(state{p},options1{:})
xlim([0 maxT])
% Hold on to make 3 plots. Create initial points and set line styles.
% Store the plots in a cell array for later reference.
hold on
plts{p,1} = plot(hh1{p},1:2,x(p,1:2),'b','linewidth',2);
plts{p,2} = plot(hh1{p},1:2,z(p,1:2),'m');
plts{p,3} = plot(hh1{p},1:2,x_est(p,1:2),':k','linewidth',2);
hold off
end
% March through time. No replotting required, just update XData and YData
for k = 2:maxT
for p = 1:4
set(plts{p,1}, 'XData', 1:k, 'YData', x(p,1:k) );
set(plts{p,2}, 'XData', 1:k, 'YData', z(p,1:k) );
set(plts{p,3}, 'XData', 1:k, 'YData', x_est(p,1:k) );
end
drawnow;
end
Now the plotting is pretty optimised. If you want the animation to be even quicker then just plot every 2nd, 3rd, ..., nth timestep instead of every timestep by using for k = 2:n:maxT
.