How would you extract items 3..6 efficiently, elegantly and pythonically from the following deque
without altering it:
from collections import deque
q = deque('',maxlen=10)
for i in range(10,20):
q.append(i)
the slice notation doesn't seem to work with deque
...
import itertools
output = list(itertools.islice(q, 3, 7))
For example:
>>> import collections, itertools
>>> q = collections.deque(xrange(10, 20))
>>> q
deque([10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19])
>>> list(itertools.islice(q, 3, 7))
[13, 14, 15, 16]
This should be more efficient the the other solutions posted so far. Proof?
[me@home]$ SETUP="import itertools,collections; q=collections.deque(xrange(1000000))"
[me@home]$ python -m timeit "$SETUP" "list(itertools.islice(q, 10000, 20000))"
10 loops, best of 3: 68 msec per loop
[me@home]$ python -m timeit "$SETUP" "[q[i] for i in xrange(10000, 20000)]"
10 loops, best of 3: 98.4 msec per loop
[me@home]$ python -m timeit "$SETUP" "list(q)[10000:20000]"
10 loops, best of 3: 107 msec per loop
output = [q[i] for i in range(3,6+1)]
I would prefer this, it's shorter so easier to read:
output = list(q)[3:6+1]
I'd add this as a new answer, to provide better formatting.
For simplicity, Shawn's answer is perfect, but if you often need to get a slice from dequeue
, you might prefer to subclass it and add a __getslice__
method.
from collections import deque
from itertools import islice
class deque_slice(deque):
def __new__(cls, *args):
return deque.__new__(cls, *args)
def __getslice__(self, start, end):
return list(islice(self, start, end))
This won't support setting a new slice, but you can implement your own custom __setslice__
method using the same concept.