可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
In C#, how does one obtain a generic enumerator from a given array?
In the code below, MyArray
is an array of MyType
objects. I'd like to obtain MyIEnumerator
in the fashion shown,
but it seems that I obtain an empty enumerator (although I've confirmed that MyArray.Length > 0
).
MyType [ ] MyArray = ... ;
IEnumerator<MyType> MyIEnumerator
= ( MyArray.GetEnumerator() as IEnumerator<MyType> ) ;
回答1:
Works on 2.0+:
((IEnumerable<MyType>)myArray).GetEnumerator()
Works on 3.5+ (fancy LINQy, a bit less efficient):
myArray.Cast<MyType>().GetEnumerator() // returns IEnumerator<MyType>
回答2:
You can decide for yourself whether casting is ugly enough to warrant an extraneous library call:
int[] arr;
IEnumerator<int> Get1()
{
return ((IEnumerable<int>)arr).GetEnumerator(); // <-- 1 non-local call
// L_0001: ldarg.0
// L_0002: ldfld int32[] foo::arr
// L_0007: castclass [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1<int32>
// L_000c: callvirt instance class [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator`1<!0> [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1<int32>::GetEnumerator()
// L_0011: stloc.0
}
IEnumerator<int> Get2()
{
return arr.AsEnumerable().GetEnumerator(); // <-- 2 non-local calls
// L_0001: ldarg.0
// L_0002: ldfld int32[] foo::arr
// L_0007: call class [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1<!!0> [System.Core]System.Linq.Enumerable::AsEnumerable<int32>(class [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1<!!0>)
// L_000c: callvirt instance class [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator`1<!0> [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1<int32>::GetEnumerator()
// L_0011: stloc.0
}
And for completeness, one should also note that the following is not correct--and will crash at runtime--because T[]
chooses the non-generic IEnumerable
interface for its default (i.e. non-explicit) implementation of GetEnumerator()
.
IEnumerator<int> NoGet() // error - do not use
{
return (IEnumerator<int>)arr.GetEnumerator();
// L_0001: ldarg.0
// L_0002: ldfld int32[] foo::arr
// L_0007: callvirt instance class [mscorlib]System.Collections.IEnumerator [mscorlib]System.Array::GetEnumerator()
// L_000c: castclass [mscorlib]System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator`1<int32>
// L_0011: stloc.0
}
The mystery is, why doesn't SZGenericArrayEnumerator<T>
inherit from SZArrayEnumerator
--an internal class which is currently marked 'sealed'--since this would allow the (covariant) generic enumerator to be returned by default?
回答3:
Since I don't like casting, a little update:
your_array.AsEnumerable().GetEnumerator();
回答4:
To Make it as clean as possible I like to let the compiler do all of the work. There are no casts (so its actually type-safe). No third party Libraries (System.Linq) are used (No runtime overhead).
public static IEnumerable<T> GetEnumerable<T>(this T[] arr)
{
return arr;
}
// And to use the code:
String[] arr = new String[0];
arr.GetEnumerable().GetEnumerator()
This takes advantage of some compiler magic that keeps everything clean.
The other point to note is that my answer is the only answer that will do compile-time checking.
For any of the other solutions if the type of "arr" changes, then calling code will compile, and fail at runtime, resulting in a runtime bug.
My answer will cause the code to not compile and therefore I have less chance of shipping a bug in my code, as it would signal to me that I am using the wrong type.
回答5:
YourArray.OfType().GetEnumerator();
may perform a little better, since it only has to check the type, and not cast.
回答6:
MyType[] arr = { new MyType(), new MyType(), new MyType() };
IEnumerable<MyType> enumerable = arr;
IEnumerator<MyType> en = enumerable.GetEnumerator();
foreach (MyType item in enumerable)
{
}
回答7:
What you can do, of course, is just implement your own generic enumerator for arrays.
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace SomeNamespace
{
public class ArrayEnumerator<T> : IEnumerator<T>
{
public ArrayEnumerator(T[] arr)
{
collection = arr;
length = arr.Length;
}
private readonly T[] collection;
private int index = -1;
private readonly int length;
public T Current { get { return collection[index]; } }
object IEnumerator.Current { get { return Current; } }
public bool MoveNext() { index++; return index < length; }
public void Reset() { index = -1; }
public void Dispose() {/* Nothing to dispose. */}
}
}
This is more or less equal to the .NET implemenation of SZGenericArrayEnumerator<T> as mentioned by Glenn Slayden. You should of course only do this, is cases where this is worth the effort. In most cases it is not.