I am not certain on the purpose for Dagger2's @Bind annotation.
From what i have read online im still not clear but here is an example:
@Module
public abstract class HomeModule {
@Binds
public abstract HomePresenter bindHomePresenter(HomePresenterImp
homePresenterImp);
}
and the class definitions look like this:
public interface HomePresenter {
Observable<List<User>> loadUsers();
}
public class HomePresenterImp implements HomePresenter {
public HomePresenterImp(){
}
@Override
public Observable<List<User>> loadUsers(){
//Return user list observable
}
}
why would i need to use @Binds if i can just use provides annotation as follows:
@Provides
public HomePresenter provideHomePresenter() {
return new HomePresenterImp();
}
what is the usecase for @Binds instead of @Provides ? if i use @Binds do i still need to declare it in my appcomponent (its an abstract class when i use @Binds)?
@Binds can be perfectly equivalent to a @Provides-annotated method like this:
@Provides
public HomePresenter provideHomePresenter() {
return new HomePresenterImp();
}
...though you'd probably prefer a variant that takes HomePresenterImp as a method parameter, which lets Dagger instantiate HomePresenterImp (assuming it has an @Inject constructor) including passing any dependencies it needs. You can also make this static, so Dagger doesn't need to instantiate your Module instance to call it.
@Provides
public static HomePresenter provideHomePresenter(HomePresenterImp presenter) {
return presenter;
}
So why would you choose @Binds instead? Dagger has a FAQ about it, but it boils down do these reasons:
- @Binds is (slightly) more compact: You can skip the implementation.
- @Binds works in interfaces and abstract classes, which are strictly required for Dagger features like @BindsOptionalOf and @ContributesAndroidInjector.
- @Binds helps your code stay efficient. @Provides methods can be instance methods, which require Dagger to instantiate your Module in order to call them. Making your @Provides method
static will also accomplish this, but your @Provides method will still compile if you forget the static. @Binds methods will not.
- @Binds prevents Dagger from having to codegen and keep a separate Factory/Provider for the object, since Java doesn't give Dagger access to know that the implementation is as simple as it is. In your case, Dagger can cast the
Provider<HomePresenterImp> to a Provider<HomePresenter> and only keep one, rather than keeping one for HomePresenter that does nothing but call the one for HomePresenterImp.
Thus, the entire thing would be well-represented as:
@Binds abstract HomePresenter bindHomePresenter(HomePresenterImp presenter);
Here a concrete case where you need Bind annotation, imagine you got a BaseActivityModule which is include in all your activity modules that provides your activity viewmodel.
@Module
object BaseActivityModule {
@Provides
@ActivityScope
@ActivityContext
@JvmStatic
fun provideViewModelProvider(
activity: AppCompatActivity,
viewModelFactory: ViewModelProvider.Factory
): ViewModelProvider = ViewModelProviders.of(activity, viewModelFactory)
}
Here you see we need to provide an AppCompatActivity and a ViewModelProvider.Factory. You cannot provide AppCompatActivity with a Provide annotation since activities are created by android.
We're assuming your concrete ActivityModule for example MainActivityModule will provide MainActivity class either because you create a MainActivity sub component or you used ContributesAndroidInjector to automatically create your sub components (but this is another talk).
So we have our MainActivityModule providing MainActivity and our MainActivityModule includes our BaseActivityModule which need an AppCompatActivity. So here the Bind magic, let's tell Dagger that when you need an AppCompatActivity you can use our MainActivity.
@Module(includes = [BaseActivityModule::class])
abstract class MainActivityModule {
@Binds
@ActivityScope
abstract fun bindActivity(activity: MainActivity): AppCompatActivity
}
You can see more from my project template here
