我难以理解为什么会出现在以下两个代码段,究竟是编译器做一个区别。
我的琐碎以下代码位,符合市场预期,没有任何问题,编译:
class base
{
public:
typedef int booboo;
};
class derived : public base
{
public:
int boo()
{
booboo bb = 1;
return bb;
}
};
int main()
{
derived d;
d.boo();
return 0;
}
我把代码从上面添加一些模板参数,并开始获得与该类型BOOBOO不是有效的错误:
template <typename T>
class base
{
public:
typedef T booboo;
};
template <typename T>
class derived : public base<T>
{
public:
//typedef typename base<T>::booboo booboo; <-- fixes the problem
booboo boo()
{
booboo bb = T(1);
return bb;
}
};
int main()
{
derived<int> d;
d.boo();
return 0;
}
错误:
prog.cpp:13:4: error: ‘booboo’ does not name a type
prog.cpp:13:4: note: (perhaps ‘typename base<T>::booboo’ was intended)
prog.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
prog.cpp:23:6: error: ‘class derived<int>’ has no member named ‘boo’
http://ideone.com/jGKYIC
。
我想在细节,典型的C ++编译器如何去有关编译的代码模板版本,它从编译原来的例子有什么不同理解,这是一个问题做了代码的多次通过和类型取决于look- UPS?