可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I'd like to invoke the pylint checker, limited to the Error signalling part, as part of my unit testing. so I checked the pylint executable script, got to the pylint.lint.Run
helper class and there I got lost in a quite long __init__
function, ending with a call to sys.exit()
.
anybody ever tried and managed to do so?
the dream-plan would be this:
if __name__ == '__main__':
import pylint.lint
pylint.lint.something(__file__, justerrors=True)
# now continue with unit testing
any hints? other than "copy the __init__
method and skip the sys.exit()
", I mean?
I don't need the tests to be run by pylint
, it might as well be pyflakes
or other software: feel free to suggest alternatives. thanks!
回答1:
Take a look at the pylint/epylint.py
which contains two different ways to start pylint programatically.
You can also simply call :
from pylint.lint import Run
Run(['--errors-only', 'myfile.py'])
for instance.
回答2:
I got the same problem recently.
syt is right, pylint.epylint
got several methods in there. However they all call a subprocess in which python is launched again. In my case, this was getting quite slow.
Building from mcarans answer, and finding that there is a flag exit, I did the following
class WritableObject(object):
"dummy output stream for pylint"
def __init__(self):
self.content = []
def write(self, st):
"dummy write"
self.content.append(st)
def read(self):
"dummy read"
return self.content
def run_pylint(filename):
"run pylint on the given file"
from pylint import lint
from pylint.reporters.text import TextReporter
ARGS = ["-r","n", "--rcfile=rcpylint"] # put your own here
pylint_output = WritableObject()
lint.Run([filename]+ARGS, reporter=TextReporter(pylint_output), exit=False)
for l in pylint_output.read():
do what ever you want with l...
which is about 3 times faster in my case.
With this I have been going through a whole project, using full output to check each source file, point errors, and rank all files from their note.
回答3:
I'm glad I came across this. I used some of the answers here and some initiative to come up with:
# a simple class with a write method
class WritableObject:
def __init__(self):
self.content = []
def write(self, string):
self.content.append(string)
pylint_output = WritableObject()
pylint = lint.Run(args, reporter=ParseableTextReporter(pylint_output), exit=False)
Args in the above is a list of strings eg. ["-r", "n", "myfile.py"]
回答4:
Instead of creating a WritableObject class we can use StringIO. StringIO contains write method.
import sys
try:
from io import StringIO
except:
from StringIO import StringIO
stdout = sys.stdout
sys.stdout = StringIO()
ARGS = ["-r","n", "--rcfile=rcpylint"]
r = lint.Run(['../test.py']+ARGS, exit=False)
test = sys.stdout.getvalue()
sys.stdout.close()
sys.stdout = stdout
print (test.split('\n'))
Source:
@cdarke 's answer
@mad7777's answer
回答5:
Another entry point for pylint is the epylint.py_run
function, that implement the stdout and stderr interception. However, as shown in the following code, pylint seems to not write its reports in stdout:
from pylint import epylint
pylint_stdout, pylint_stderr = epylint.py_run(__file__, return_std=True)
print(pylint_stdout.getvalue()) # -> there is just the final rank, no report nor message
print(pylint_stderr.getvalue())
Now, i found that pylint from API and pylint from CLI do not use the same default parameters. So, you just have to provides the parameters you need to pylint.
from pylint import epylint
options = '--enable=all' # all messages will be shown
options += '--reports=y' # also print the reports (ascii tables at the end)
pylint_stdout, pylint_stderr = epylint.py_run(__file__ + ' ' + options, return_std=True)
print(pylint_stdout.getvalue())
print(pylint_stderr.getvalue())
As described here, pylint will perform the parsing itself, and will correctly output the expected results in stdout.