I am writing up a talk on XS and I need to know when the community thinks it is proper to reach for XS.
问题:
回答1:
I can think of at least three reasons to use XS:
- You have a C library you want to access in Perl 5
- You have a block of code that is provably slowing down your program and it would be faster if written in C
- You need access to something only available in XS
Reason 1 is obvious and should need no explaination.
When you really need reason 2 is less obvious. Often you are better off looking at how the code is structured. You should only invoke reason 2 if you have profiled your code and have a benchmark and test suite to prove that the XS code is faster and correct.
Reason 3 is a dangerous reason. It is rare that you actually need to look into Perl's guts to do something, but there is at least one valid case.
回答2:
In a few cases, better memory management is another reason for using XS. For example, if you have a very large block of objects of some similar type, this can be managed more efficiently through XS. KinoSearch
uses this for tokens, for example, where start and end offsets in a large string can be managed more effectively through XS than as a huge pool of scalars. PDL
also has a memory management aspect to it, as well as speed.
There are proposals to integrate some of this approach into core Perl in the long term, initially because it offers a chance to make sharing data in threading better: see: http://openparallel.com/2011/07/05/a-new-hope-for-efficient-safe-data-sharing-between-threads-in-perl/.