我怎样才能防止内联子查询的Postgres？(How can I prevent Postgres

下面是对的Postgres 9.1.6慢查询，即使最大计数2，与已经通过其主键标识的两行：（4.5秒），

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE id IN ('6d48fc431d21', 'd9e659e756ad') AND data ? 'building_floorspace' AND data ?| ARRAY['elec_mean_monthly_use', 'gas_mean_monthly_use'];
                                                                     QUERY PLAN                                                                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=4.09..4.09 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=4457.886..4457.887 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Index Scan using idx_tbl_on_data_gist on tbl  (cost=0.00..4.09 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=4457.880..4457.880 rows=0 loops=1)
         Index Cond: ((data ? 'building_floorspace'::text) AND (data ?| '{elec_mean_monthly_use,gas_mean_monthly_use}'::text[]))
         Filter: ((id)::text = ANY ('{6d48fc431d21,d9e659e756ad}'::text[]))
 Total runtime: 4457.948 ms
(5 rows)

嗯，也许如果我做一个子查询只有主键部分首先...：（没了，还是4.5+秒）

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (  SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id IN ('6d48fc431d21', 'd9e659e756ad')  ) AS t WHERE data ? 'building_floorspace' AND data ?| ARRAY['elec_mean_monthly_use', 'gas_mean_monthly_use'];
                                                                     QUERY PLAN                                                                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=4.09..4.09 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=4854.170..4854.171 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Index Scan using idx_tbl_on_data_gist on tbl  (cost=0.00..4.09 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=4854.165..4854.165 rows=0 loops=1)
         Index Cond: ((data ? 'building_floorspace'::text) AND (data ?| '{elec_mean_monthly_use,gas_mean_monthly_use}'::text[]))
         Filter: ((id)::text = ANY ('{6d48fc431d21,d9e659e756ad}'::text[]))
 Total runtime: 4854.220 ms
(5 rows)

我怎样才能防止内联子查询的Postgres？

背景：我使用的Postgres 9.1表hstore并用GiST的索引就可以了。

Answer 1:

我觉得OFFSET 0是更好的方法，因为它更明显地显示出奇怪的事情是怎么回事黑客攻击，这是不可能的，我们会永远改变优化器的行为围绕OFFSET 0 ... wheras希望的CTE将成为inlineable在一些点。 下面的解释是为了完整的缘故; 使用西莫的答案。

对于不相关子查询你可以利用PostgreSQL的拒绝内联WITH查询条件，修改你的查询为：

WITH t AS (
    SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id IN ('6d48fc431d21', 'd9e659e756ad')
)
SELECT COUNT(*) 
FROM t 
WHERE data ? 'building_floorspace' 
AND data ?| ARRAY['elec_mean_monthly_use', 'gas_mean_monthly_use'];

这有很大的效果相同OFFSET 0黑客，而像offset 0的PG的优化黑客攻击怪癖，人们用它来绕过PG缺乏查询的提示...使用它们作为查询提示。

Answer 2:

Apparently there's a way to tell Postgres not to inline: (0.223ms!)

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (  SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id IN ('6d48fc431d21', 'd9e659e756ad') OFFSET 0 ) AS t WHERE data ? 'building_floorspace' AND data ?| ARRAY['elec_mean_monthly_use', 'gas_mean_monthly_use'];
                                                                QUERY PLAN                                                                
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=8.14..8.15 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.165..0.166 rows=1 loops=1)
   ->  Subquery Scan on t  (cost=4.14..8.14 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.160..0.160 rows=0 loops=1)
         Filter: ((t.data ? 'building_floorspace'::text) AND (t.data ?| '{elec_mean_monthly_use,gas_mean_monthly_use}'::text[]))
         ->  Limit  (cost=4.14..8.13 rows=2 width=496) (actual time=0.086..0.092 rows=2 loops=1)
               ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on tbl  (cost=4.14..8.13 rows=2 width=496) (actual time=0.083..0.086 rows=2 loops=1)
                     Recheck Cond: ((id)::text = ANY ('{6d48fc431d21,d9e659e756ad}'::text[]))
                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tbl_pkey  (cost=0.00..4.14 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.068..0.068 rows=2 loops=1)
                           Index Cond: ((id)::text = ANY ('{6d48fc431d21,d9e659e756ad}'::text[]))
 Total runtime: 0.223 ms
(9 rows)

The trick is OFFSET 0 in the subquery.

文章来源: How can I prevent Postgres from inlining a subquery?