The following compiles fine:
Object o = new Object();
System.out.println(o instanceof Cloneable);
But this doesn't:
String s = new String();
System.out.println(s instanceof Cloneable);
A compiler error is thrown.
What is the problem?
A more blatant incarnation of your problem is the following:
if ("foo" instanceof Number)
// "Incompatible conditional operand types String and Number"
This is specified in JLS 15.20.2 Type comparison operator instanceof
:
RelationalExpression:
RelationalExpression instanceof ReferenceType
If a cast of the RelationalExpression to the ReferenceType would be rejected as a compile-time error, then the instanceof
relational expression likewise produces a compile-time error. In such a situation, the result of the instanceof
expression could never be true.
That is, since this cast expression generates a compile time error:
(Number) "foo"
so must this expression:
("foo" instanceof Number)
Your case is a bit more subtle, but the principle is the same:
String
is a final class
String
does not implement Cloneable
- Therefore you can't do
(Cloneable) aString
- Therefore also you can't do
aString instanceof Cloneable
A related issue that I have come across recently (and which led me to this page, before I figured out what was going on) is that the Eclipse environment can report "Incompatible conditional operand types" in an 'instanceof' expression erroneously due to a missing 'import' statement for the type on the right of the 'instanceof'. I spent a while trying to figure out how the types in question could possibly be incompatible before figuring out that a missing import was causing the whole problem. Hopefully this information saves somebody some time.
The compiler knows that String
is a final class and doesn't implement Cloneable
. So no instance of String can ever be an instance of Cloneable
. It's stopping you from thinking you've got a meaningful test when actually it will always print "false".