I've added one to many relationship in Room using Relation.
I referred to this post to write the following code for relation in Room.
The post tells how to read the values from the database but storing the entities into the database resulted in userId
to be empty which means there is no relation between the 2 tables.
I'm not sure what is the ideal way to insert
a User
and List of Pet
into the database while having userId
value.
1) User Entity:
@Entity
public class User {
@PrimaryKey
public int id; // User id
}
2) Pet Entity:
@Entity
public class Pet {
@PrimaryKey
public int id; // Pet id
public int userId; // User id
public String name;
}
3) UserWithPets POJO:
// Note: No annotation required at this class definition.
public class UserWithPets {
@Embedded
public User user;
@Relation(parentColumn = "id", entityColumn = "userId", entity = Pet.class)
public List<Pet> pets;
}
Now to fetch the records from DB we use the following DAO
:
@Dao
public interface UserDao {
@Insert
fun insertUser(user: User)
@Query("SELECT * FROM User")
public List<UserWithPets> loadUsersWithPets();
}
EDIT
I have created this issue https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/62848977 on the issue tracker. Hopefully they will do something regarding it.
You can do this by changing your Dao from an interface to an abstract class.
@Dao
public abstract class UserDao {
public void insertPetsForUser(User user, List<Pet> pets){
for(Pet pet : pets){
pet.setUserId(user.getId());
}
_insertAll(pets);
}
@Insert
abstract void _insertAll(List<Pet> pets); //this could go in a PetDao instead...
@Insert
public abstract void insertUser(User user);
@Query("SELECT * FROM User")
abstract List<UserWithPets> loadUsersWithPets();
}
You can also go further by having a User
object have an @Ignored List<Pet> pets
@Entity
public class User {
@PrimaryKey
public int id; // User id
@Ignored
public List<Pet> pets
}
and then the Dao can map UserWithPets
to User:
public List<User> getUsers() {
List<UserWithPets> usersWithPets = loadUserWithPets();
List<User> users = new ArrayList<User>(usersWithPets.size())
for(UserWithPets userWithPets: usersWithPets) {
userWithPets.user.pets = userWithPets.pets;
users.add(userWithPets.user);
}
return users;
}
This leaves you with the full Dao:
@Dao
public abstract class UserDao {
public void insertAll(List<User> users) {
for(User user:users) {
if(user.pets != null) {
insertPetsForUser(user, user.pets);
}
}
_insertAll(users);
}
private void insertPetsForUser(User user, List<Pet> pets){
for(Pet pet : pets){
pet.setUserId(user.getId());
}
_insertAll(pets);
}
public List<User> getUsersWithPetsEagerlyLoaded() {
List<UserWithPets> usersWithPets = _loadUsersWithPets();
List<User> users = new ArrayList<User>(usersWithPets.size())
for(UserWithPets userWithPets: usersWithPets) {
userWithPets.user.pets = userWithPets.pets;
users.add(userWithPets.user);
}
return users;
}
//package private methods so that wrapper methods are used, Room allows for this, but not private methods, hence the underscores to put people off using them :)
@Insert
abstract void _insertAll(List<Pet> pets);
@Insert
abstract void _insertAll(List<User> users);
@Query("SELECT * FROM User")
abstract List<UserWithPets> _loadUsersWithPets();
}
You may want to have the insertAll(List<Pet>)
and insertPetsForUser(User, List<Pet>)
methods in a PetDAO instead... how you partition your DAOs is up to you! :)
Anyway, it's just another option. Wrapping your DAOs in DataSource objects also works.
There is no native solution till any update in Room Library but you can do this by a trick. Find below mentioned.
Just Create a User with Pets (Ignore pets).
@Entity
public class User {
@PrimaryKey
public int id;
@Ignore
private List<Pet> petList;
}
Create Pet.
@Entity
public class Pet
{
@PrimaryKey
public int id;
public int userId;
public String name;
}
Now Finally in UserDao.
@Insert
public abstract void insertUser(User user);
@Insert
public abstract void insertPetList(List<Pet> pets);
@Query("SELECT * FROM User WHERE id =:id")
public abstract User getUser(int id);
@Query("SELECT * FROM Pet WHERE userId =:userId")
public abstract List<Pet> getPetList(int userId);
public void insertUserWithPet(User user) {
List<Pet> pets = user.getPetList();
for (int i = 0; i < pets.size(); i++) {
pets.get(i).setUserId(user.getId());
}
insertPetList(pets);
insertUser(user);
}
public User getUserWithPets(int id) {
User user = getUser(id);
List<Pet> pets = getPetList(id);
user.setPetList(pets);
return user;
}
Your Problem can be solved by this without creating UserWithPets POJO.
As Room does not manage the Relations of the entities, you have to set the userId
on each pet yourself and save them. As long as there are not too many pets at once, I'd use an insertAll
method to keep it short.
@Dao
public interface PetDao {
@Insert
void insertAll(List<Pet> pets);
}
I don't think there's any better way at the moment.
To make the handling easier, I'd use an abstraction in the layer above the DAOs:
public void insertPetsForUser(User user, List<Pet> pets){
for(Pet pet : pets){
pet.setUserId(user.getId());
}
petDao.insertAll(pets);
}
Currently there is no native solution to this problem. I have created this https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/62848977 on Google's issue tracker and the Architecture Components Team said they will adding a native solution in or after v1.0 of Room library.
Temporary Workaround:
Meanwhile you can use the solution mentioned by tknell.
public void insertPetsForUser(User user, List<Pet> pets){
for(Pet pet : pets){
pet.setUserId(user.getId());
}
petDao.insertAll(pets);
}