可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
I'm trying to pass a parameter in the onclick event. Below is a sample code:
<div id="div"></div>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
var div = document.getElementById('div');
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var link = document.createElement('a');
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.innerHTML = i + '';
link.onclick= function() { onClickLink(i+'');};
div.appendChild(link);
div.appendChild(document.createElement('BR'));
}
function onClickLink(text) {
alert('Link ' + text + ' clicked');
return false;
}
</script>
However whenever I click on any of the links the alert always shows 'Link 10 clicked'!
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks
回答1:
This happens because the i propagates up the scope once the function is invoked. You can avoid this issue using a closure.
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var link = document.createElement('a');
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.innerHTML = i + '';
link.onclick = (function() {
var currentI = i;
return function() {
onClickLink(currentI + '');
}
})();
div.appendChild(link);
div.appendChild(document.createElement('BR'));
}
Or if you want more concise syntax, I suggest you use Nick Craver's solution.
回答2:
This is happening because they're all referencing the same i
variable, which is changing every loop, and left as 10
at the end of the loop. You can resolve it using a closure like this:
link.onclick = function(j) { return function() { onClickLink(j+''); }; }(i);
You can give it a try here
Or, make this
be the link you clicked in that handler, like this:
link.onclick = function(j) { return function() { onClickLink.call(this, j); }; }(i);
You can try that version here
回答3:
link.onclick = function() { onClickLink(i+''); };
Is a closure and stores a reference to the variable i
, not the value that i
holds when the function is created. One solution would be to wrap the contents of the for
loop in a function do this:
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) (function(i) {
var link = document.createElement('a');
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.innerHTML = i + '';
link.onclick= function() { onClickLink(i+'');};
div.appendChild(link);
div.appendChild(document.createElement('BR'));
}(i));
回答4:
Try this:
<div id="div"></div>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
var div = document.getElementById('div');
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var f = function() {
var link = document.createElement('a');
var j = i; // this j is scoped to our anonymous function
// while i is scoped outside the anonymous function,
// getting incremented by the for loop
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.innerHTML = j + '';
link.onclick= function() { onClickLink(j+'');};
div.appendChild(link);
div.appendChild(document.createElement('br')); // lower case BR, please!
}(); // call the function immediately
}
function onClickLink(text) {
alert('Link ' + text + ' clicked');
return false;
}
</script>
回答5:
or you could use this line:
link.setAttribute('onClick', 'onClickLink('+i+')');
instead of this one:
link.onclick= function() { onClickLink(i+'');};
回答6:
Another simple way ( might not be the best practice) but works like charm. Build the HTML tag of your element(hyperLink or Button) dynamically with javascript, and can pass multiple parameters as well.
// variable to hold the HTML Tags
var ProductButtonsHTML ="";
//Run your loop
for (var i = 0; i < ProductsJson.length; i++){
// Build the <input> Tag with the required parameters for Onclick call. Use double quotes.
ProductButtonsHTML += " <input type='button' value='" + ProductsJson[i].DisplayName + "'
onclick = \"BuildCartById('" + ProductsJson[i].SKU+ "'," + ProductsJson[i].Id + ")\"></input> ";
}
// Add the Tags to the Div's innerHTML.
document.getElementById("divProductsMenuStrip").innerHTML = ProductButtonsHTML;
回答7:
It is probably better to create a dedicated function to create the link so you can avoid creating two anonymous functions. Thus:
<div id="div"></div>
<script>
function getLink(id)
{
var link = document.createElement('a');
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.innerHTML = id;
link.onclick = function()
{
onClickLink(id);
};
link.style.display = 'block';
return link;
}
var div = document.getElementById('div');
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i += 1)
{
div.appendChild(getLink(i.toString()));
}
</script>
Although in both cases you end up with two functions, I just think it is better to wrap it in a function that is semantically easier to comprehend.
回答8:
onclick vs addEventListener. A matter of preference perhaps (where IE>9).
// Using closures
function onClickLink(e, index) {
alert(index);
return false;
}
var div = document.getElementById('div');
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var link = document.createElement('a');
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.innerHTML = i + '';
link.addEventListener('click', (function(e) {
var index = i;
return function(e) {
return onClickLink(e, index);
}
})(), false);
div.appendChild(link);
div.appendChild(document.createElement('BR'));
}
How abut just using a plain data-* attribute, not as cool as a closure, but..
function onClickLink(e) {
alert(e.target.getAttribute('data-index'));
return false;
}
var div = document.getElementById('div');
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var link = document.createElement('a');
link.setAttribute('href', '#');
link.setAttribute('data-index', i);
link.innerHTML = i + ' Hello';
link.addEventListener('click', onClickLink, false);
div.appendChild(link);
div.appendChild(document.createElement('BR'));
}