Objective-C的 - 伊娃作用域的方法变量?(Objective-C - iVar Scop

2019-06-27 03:43发布

我当时在Objective-C乱搞早了,我遇到了一个很常见的情况:

我有一类,这是不是一个单身,这需要在方法调用之间共享的变量,如static ,但每个实例需要它自己的变量。 然而,仅需要这个变量在一个特定的方法中使用,我们把它叫做-foo

我很想做的,是有一个宏,让我们把它叫做ivar ,它可以让我做到以下几点:

@implementation MyClass 

-(foo)
{
    ivar int someVal = 10; // default value, ivar scoped variable.
}

-(bar)
{
    someVal = 5; // error, outside of `foo`'s scope.
}

@end

如何定义的变量并不重要,我(要么喜欢宏OBJC_IVAR(Type, Name, Default)ivar someType someName = value ),只要符合以下要求:

  • 有线程安全
  • 可以有另一种方法同名的变量(但不同的值)
  • 种类少(没有关系的变量是什么类型)
  • 默认值支持
  • 变量可以在同一行(我不应该写15行代码只是把一个变量在我的代码)声明

我目前工作的一个Objective-C ++实现我自己,我只是想知道如果任何人有任何想法(或现有工具)对如何做到这一点。

显然,这并不一定与真正的伊娃完成。 更有可能的是,这应该在运行时,其还管理释放了我们相关对象来完成。

Answer 1:

经过大量的时间花费,我相信我有在Objective-C一个完全可行的解决方案++。 一些特点:

  • 该变量是唯一的。 只要他们有不同的范围,它们的值是独立
  • 每一个实例都有它自己的价值
  • 线程安全(通过相关的对象来完成)
  • 简单的变量声明:

    • 宏重载:只指定您需要的信息
    • 可能的方式来定义一个OBJC_IVAR:

       OBJC_IVAR(); // creates a warning, does nothing OBJC_IVAR(Name); // creates an ivar named 'Name' of type 'id' OBJC_IVAR(Type, Name); // creates an ivar named 'Name' of type 'Type' OBJC_IVAR(Type, Name, Default); // creates an ivar named 'Name', of type 'Type', and a default value of 'Default' (which is only executed once); 
  • C ++模板全部类型支持( __weak__strong__autoreleasingvolatile等等都支持)

  • 子类不与他们分享超变量(所以没有机会为冲突,变量真的被限制在其范围)。
  • 在单身中使用没有问题
  • 很快,大约需要15-30个CPU周期来查找一个变量,一旦它的抬头,需要只要任何其他变量来设置它。
  • 大多数的辛勤工作是由预处理器,允许更快的代码完成
  • 只需拖动和拖放到现有的Xcode项目,不依赖于定制处理器

一些小缺点,实现:

  • 对象必须具有所有权说明符(限制使用C ++的引用: Reference to non-const type 'id' with no explicit ownership )。 很容易通过增加固定__strong__weak ,或__autoreleasing到变量的类型

  • 实施是难以阅读。 因为它依赖这么多的C ++模板和Objective-C融洽地共同工作,这是很难只是改变“一件事”,希望为它工作。 我已经加入广泛征求意见的实施,使希望这释放一些负担。

  • 方法混写能majorly混淆。 不是最大的问题,但如果你开始与方法混写玩耍,不,如果你得到意想不到的结果感到惊讶。

  • 不能被一个C ++对象内部使用。 不幸的是,C ++不支持运行时的属性,如Objective-C的呢,​​所以我们不能依靠被清理我们的变量也说不定。 出于这个原因,你不能使用OBJC_IVAR而C ++对象内。 我会希望看到的一个实现,虽然。

  • #line会搞砸厉害,所以不要使用它。

版本历史

  • 1.0:初始版本
  • 1.1:更新OBJC_IVAR_NAME只依靠预处理器。 其结果是,我们不能使用__func__

因此,事不宜迟,这里是代码:

OBJC_IVAR.hpp

//
//  OBJC_IVAR.h
//  TestProj
//
//  Created by Richard Ross on 8/17/12.
//  Copyright (c) 2012 Ultimate Computer Services, Inc. All rights reserved.
//
#ifndef OBJC_IVAR_HPP
#define OBJC_IVAR_HPP

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <objc/runtime.h>

#import "NSValue+CppObject.h"

// Argument counting algorithm. Not too complex
#define __NARG(_1, _2, _3, _4, _5, VAL, ...) VAL
#define NARG(...) __NARG(__VA_ARGS__, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)

// Different implementations based on number of parameters passed in
#define __OBJC_IVAR(N, ...) _OBJC_IVAR_ ## N (__VA_ARGS__)
#define _OBJC_IVAR(N, ...) __OBJC_IVAR(N, __VA_ARGS__)

// Usage: OBJC_IVAR(Type (optional), Name (required), Default (optional))
#define OBJC_IVAR(...) _OBJC_IVAR(NARG(__VA_ARGS__), __VA_ARGS__)

// create a unique name. we use '__COUNTER__' here to support scoping on the same line, for compressed source code
#define __OBJC_IVAR_STRINGIFY_NAME(file, line, name, counter) @file ":" #line " " #name ":" #counter
#define _OBJC_IVAR_NAME(file, line, name, counter) __OBJC_IVAR_STRINGIFY_NAME(file, line, name, counter)
#define OBJC_IVAR_NAME(name) _OBJC_IVAR_NAME(__FILE__, __LINE__, name, __COUNTER__)

// old style creation. advantage: uses __func__ to determine calling function
// #define OBJC_IVAR_NAME(Name) [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%s:%i %s:%s:%i", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, #Name, __COUNTER__]

// implemenations for each of the overloads
#define _OBJC_IVAR_0(...) _Pragma("message \"Cannot call OBJC_IVAR with 0 params!\"")
#define _OBJC_IVAR_1(Name) _OBJC_IVAR_2(__strong id, Name)

// first major implemenation. because we do no assignment here, we don't have to check for is_set
#define _OBJC_IVAR_2(Type, Name) Type& Name = (_OBJC_IVAR::IMPL<Type>(self, OBJC_IVAR_NAME(Name)))

// this is where things get fun. we have 'OBJC_IVAR_CUR_NAME', instead of calling OBJC_IVAR_NAME
// multiple times, because we must ensure that COUNTER does not change during the course of the macro
// this is the 'inner bowels' of C, and it's quite hacky. Returns a reference to an associated object
// which is wrapped in a NSValue. Note that we only evaluate 'default' once throught the course of the
// application's cycle, so you can feel free to put intensive loading code there.
static NSString *_OBJC_IVAR_CUR_NAME;
#define _OBJC_IVAR_3(Type, Name, Default) Type& Name = (_OBJC_IVAR::IS_SET(self, (_OBJC_IVAR_CUR_NAME = OBJC_IVAR_NAME(Name))) ? _OBJC_IVAR::IMPL<Type>(self, _OBJC_IVAR_CUR_NAME) : _OBJC_IVAR::IMPL<Type>(self, _OBJC_IVAR_CUR_NAME, Default))

// namespace to wrap al lof our functions
namespace _OBJC_IVAR
{
    // internal dictionary of all associated object names, so that we don't run
    // into memory management issues.  we use a set here, because we should never
    // have duplicate associated object names.
    static NSMutableSet *_names = [NSMutableSet set];

    // wraps a value and a reference to a value. used over std::reference_wrapper,
    // as that doesn't actually copy in the value passed. That is required for what
    // we are doing, as we cannot be assigning to constants.
    template<typename T>
    class Wrapper {
    private:
        // private value wrapped by this object.
        T _value;
        // private reference wrapped by this object. should always point to _value.
        T& _ref;

    public:
        // default constructor. assumes 'T' has a valid 0-argument constructor
        Wrapper() : _value(), _ref(_value) { }

        // argument constructor. makes sure that value is initialized properly
        Wrapper(T val) : _value(val), _ref(_value) { }

        // returns the reference wrapped by this object
        operator T& () {
            return _ref;
        }

        T& get() {
            return _ref;
        }
    };

    // interns a name. because objc_getAssociatedObject works only by comparing
    // pointers (and +stringWithFormat: isn't guaranteed to return the same pointer),
    // we have to make sure that we maintain a list of all valid associated object
    // names. these are NOT linked to specific objects, which allows us to reuse some
    // memory
    inline NSString *name_intern(NSString *name)
    {
        // intern the value. first check if the object has been interned already,
        // and if it is, return that interned value
        if (id tmpName = [_names member:name])
        {
            name = tmpName;
        }

        // if we haven't interned this value before, then add it to the list and return it.
        else
        {
            [_names addObject:name];
        }

        return name;
    }

    // check and see if the requested iVar has been set yet. used for default value setting
    BOOL IS_SET(id target, NSString *name)
    {
        // first intern the name
        name = name_intern(name);

        // check if the object has this property. objc_getAssociatedObject will ALWAYS
        // return NULL if the object doesn't exist. Note the bridged cast. This is because
        // objc_getAssociatedObject doesn't care what you throw into the second parameter,
        // as long as it is a pointer. That gives us the flexibility at a later date, to,
        // for example, just pass a pointer to a single byte, and pull out the value that
        // way. However, we pass in a NSString pointer, because it makes it easy for us to
        // use and to re-use later.
        id val = objc_getAssociatedObject(target, (__bridge const void *) name);

        return val != nil;
    }

    // the actual implementation for setting the iVar. luckily this code isn't too hacky,
    // but it is a bit confusing.
    template<typename T>
    Wrapper<T>& IMPL(id target, NSString *name)
    {
        // first intern the name
        name = name_intern(name);

        // define a reference. we use pointers & new here, because C++ memory managment is
        // weird at best. Most of the time, you should be using RAII, but when dealing with
        // templates & objective-c interpolation, it is almost required that you use pointers
        // with new.
        Wrapper<T> *reference = nullptr;

        // check and see if the object already contains this property, if so, return that value
        NSValue *result = objc_getAssociatedObject(target, (__bridge const void *) name);
        if (result == nil)
        {
            // at this point, we need to create a new iVar, with the default constructor for the type.
            // for objective-c objects this is 'nil', for integers and floating point values this is 0,
            // for C++ structs and classes, this calls the default constructor. If one doesn't exist,
            // you WILL get a compile error.
            reference = new Wrapper<T>();

            // we now set up the object that will hold this wrapper. This is an extension on NSValue
            // which allows us to store a generic pointer (in this case a C++ object), and run desired
            // code on -dealloc (which will be called at the time the parent object is destroyed), in
            // this case, free the memory used by our wrapper.
            result = [NSValue valueWithCppObject:reference onDealloc:^(void *) {
                delete reference;
            }];

            // finally, set the associated object to the target, and now we are good to go.
            // We use OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN, so that our NSValue is properly freed when done.
            objc_setAssociatedObject(target, (__bridge const void *) name, result, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN);
        }

        // from result, we cast it's -cppObjectValue to a Wrapper, to pull out the value.
        reference = static_cast<Wrapper<T> *>([result cppObjectValue]);

        // finally, return the pointer as a reference, not a pointer
        return *reference;
    }

    // this is pretty much the same as the other IMPL, but it has specific code for default values.
    // I will ignore everything that is the same about the two functions, and only focus on the
    // differences, which are few, but mandatory.
    template<typename T>
    Wrapper<T>& IMPL(id target, NSString *name, const T& defVal)
    {
        name = name_intern(name);

        Wrapper<T> *reference = nullptr; // asign to be the default constructor for 'T'

        NSValue *result = objc_getAssociatedObject(target, (__bridge const void *) name);
        if (result == nil)
        {
            // this is the only difference. Instead of constructing with the default constructor,
            // simply pass in our new default value as a copy.
            reference = new Wrapper<T>(defVal);
            result = [NSValue valueWithCppObject:reference onDealloc:^(void *) {
                delete reference;
            }];

            objc_setAssociatedObject(target, (__bridge const void *) name, result, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN);
        }

        reference = static_cast<Wrapper<T> *>([result cppObjectValue]);
        return *reference;
    }
}

#endif // OBJC_IVAR_HPP

NSValue + CppObject.h

//
//  NSValue+CppObject.h
//  TestProj
//
//  Created by Richard Ross on 8/17/12.
//  Copyright (c) 2012 Ultimate Computer Services, Inc. All rights reserved.
//

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>

// Extension on NSValue to add C++ object support. Because of the difficulty
// involved in templates, I took the easy way out and simply passed in a block
// of code to be run at dealloc.
@interface NSValue (CppObject)

// create a new NSValue instance that holds ptr, and calls 'deallocBlock' on destruction.
+(id) valueWithCppObject:(void *) ptr onDealloc:(void (^)(void *)) deallocBlock;
-(id) initWithCppObject:(void *)  ptr onDealloc:(void (^)(void *)) deallocBlock;

// get the held pointer of this object. I called it -cppObjectValue, so
// there was no confusion with -pointerValue.
-(void *) cppObjectValue;

@end

NSValue + CppObject.m

//
//  NSValue+CppObject.m
//  TestProj
//
//  Created by Richard Ross on 8/17/12.
//  Copyright (c) 2012 Ultimate Computer Services, Inc. All rights reserved.
//

#import "NSValue+CppObject.h"

// the concrete NSValue subclass for supporting C++ objects. Pretty straight-forward interface.
@interface ConcreteCppObject : NSValue
{
    // the underlying object that is being pointed to
    void *_object;
    // the block that is called on -dealloc
    void (^_deallocBlock)(void *);
}

@end

@implementation ConcreteCppObject

// object initialization
+(id) valueWithCppObject:(void *)ptr onDealloc:(void (^)(void *))deallocBlock
{
    return [[self alloc] initWithCppObject:ptr onDealloc:deallocBlock];
}

-(id) initWithCppObject:(void *)ptr onDealloc:(void (^)(void *))deallocBlock
{
    if (self = [super init])
    {
        _object = ptr;
        _deallocBlock = deallocBlock;
    }

    return self;
}

// required methods for subclassing NSValue
-(const char *) objCType
{
    return @encode(void *);
}

-(void) getValue:(void *)value
{
    *((void **) value) = _object;
}

// comparison
-(BOOL) isEqual:(id)compare
{
    if (![compare isKindOfClass:[self class]])
        return NO;

    return [compare cppObjectValue] == [self cppObjectValue];
}

// cleanup
-(void) dealloc
{
    // this should manage cleanup for us
    _deallocBlock(_object);
}

// value access
-(void *) cppObjectValue
{
    return _object;
}


@end

// NSValue additions for creating the concrete instances
@implementation NSValue (CppObject)

// object initialization
+(id) valueWithCppObject:(void *)ptr onDealloc:(void (^)(void *))deallocBlock
{
    return [[ConcreteCppObject alloc] initWithCppObject:ptr onDealloc:deallocBlock];
}

-(id) initWithCppObject:(void *)ptr onDealloc:(void (^)(void *))deallocBlock
{
    return [[self class] valueWithCppObject:ptr onDealloc:deallocBlock];
}

// unless the NSValue IS a ConcreteCppObject, then we shouldn't do anything here
-(void *) cppObjectValue
{
    [self doesNotRecognizeSelector:_cmd];

    return nil;
}

@end

实例应用:

#import "OBJC_IVAR.hpp"

@interface SomeObject : NSObject

-(void) doSomething;

@end

@implementation SomeObject

-(void) doSomething
{
    OBJC_IVAR(__strong id, test, @"Hello World!");
    OBJC_IVAR(int, test2, 15);

    NSLog(@"%@", test);
    NSLog(@"%i", test2 += 7);

    // new scope
    {
        OBJC_IVAR(int, test, 100);

        NSLog(@"%i", ++test);
    }

    [self somethingElse];
}

-(void) somethingElse
{
    OBJC_IVAR(int, newVar, 7);

    NSLog(@"%i", newVar++);
}

@end

int main()
{
    SomeObject *obj = [SomeObject new];

    [obj doSomething];
    [obj doSomething];
    [obj doSomething];
}


Answer 2:

我有一类,这是不是一个单身,这需要在方法调用之间共享的变量,如静态的,但每个实例需要它自己的变量。

在这种情况下,该变量是对象的状态的一部分,因此最合适的做法是使用一个实例变量(或属性)。 这正是高德是 ,无论他们是在十几方法使用或只有一个。

我目前工作的一个Objective-C ++实现我自己,我只是想知道如果任何人有任何想法(或现有工具)对如何做到这一点。

我的建议是这样做的。 如果你的目标是为了避免混乱,不要去尝试不必要的到新的存储类添加到语言。

但是,如果你决定去追求这条线,我想看看使用块而不是关联对象。 块得到自己的那被限定在块的寿命变量的副本。 例如,你可以这样做:

- (void)func
{
    __block int i = 0;
    void (^foo)() = ^{
        i++;
        NSLog(@"i = %d", i);
    };

    foo();
    foo();
    foo();
}

而你得到的输出是:

i = 1
i = 2
i = 3

也许你可以找到一个巧妙的方式来包装了一个宏,但在我看来像很多麻烦,只是为了避免声明实例变量。



文章来源: Objective-C - iVar Scoped Method Variables?