Can two log4j fileappenders write to the same file

问题:

Forget for a second the question of why on earth would you do such a thing - if, for whatever reason, two FileAppenders are configured with the same file - will this setup work?

回答1:

Log4j's FileAppender does not allow for two JVM's writing to the same file. If you try, you'll get a corrupt log file. However, logback, log4j's successor, in prudent mode allows two appenders even in different JVMs to write to the same file.

回答2:

It doesn't directly answer your question, but log4*net*'s FileAppender has a LockingModel attribute that you can set to only lock when the file is actually in use. So if you had two FileAppenders working in the same thread with MinimalLock set, it would probably work perfectly fine. On different threads, you might hit deadlock once in a while.

The FileAppender supports pluggable file locking models via the LockingModel property. The default behavior, implemented by FileAppender.ExclusiveLock is to obtain an exclusive write lock on the file until this appender is closed. The alternative model, FileAppender.MinimalLock, only holds a write lock while the appender is writing a logging event.

A cursory web search didn't turn up any useful results about implementing MinimalLock in log4j.

回答3:

From Log4j FAQ a3.3

How do I get multiple process to log to the same file?

You may have each process log to a SocketAppender. The receiving SocketServer (or SimpleSocketServer) can receive all the events and send them to a single log file.

As to what that actually means I will be investigating myself.

I also found the following workaround on another SO question:

Code + Example