I have a very basic question ragarding Java generics . I thought that both List<Number>
and List<? extends Number>
are homogeneous . Am I right or is there something fundamental I am missing ?
问题:
回答1:
Generic types are more pedantic.
<? extends Number>
means Number or an unknown a sub class. If you obtain such a value it will be a Number
, but you cannot give a value of this type because you don't know which is valid.
The difference is in arguments and return values.
List<Number> numbers = new ArrayList<Number>();
Number n = 1;
numbers.add(n); // ok.
n = numbers.get(0); // ok
numbers.add(1); // ok.
List<? extends Number> numbers2 = new ArrayList<Double>();
numbers2.add(n); // not ok
n = numbers2.get(0); // ok
List<? super Number> numbers3 = new ArrayList<Serializable>();
numbers3.add(n); // ok
n = numbers3.get(0); // not ok.
super
is used in a few places to signify the type can be a super type. e.g.
In Collections, this method says the Comparator needs to be able to compare the same type or any super type.
public static <T> void sort(List<T> list, Comparator<? super T> c)
This means you can have
Comparator<Number> comparesAnyNumbers = ...
List<Integer> ints = ...
Collections.sort(ints, comparesAnyNumbers);
回答2:
Generics are compile time language features, means, they don't exist in run-time. In generic mechanism, for compile-time checks, they are not homogeneous, i.e. if you want to use polymorphism in generic type.
Following gives you a compile time error, although it seems a valid definition:
List<Number> list = new ArrayList <Integer>();
whereas
List<? extends Number> list = new ArrayList <Integer>();
is valid. Moreover, you can't use wildcard types on the right side:
List list = new ArrayList <? extends Integer>();
won't be compiled.
回答3:
List<Number>
--> List of Number
s (or instances of Number
)
List<? extends Number>
--> List any type which extends Number