MySQL UPDATE operations on InnoDB occasionally tim

问题:

These are simple UPDATEs on very small tables in an InnoDB database. On occasion, an operation appears to lock, and doesn't timeout. Then every subsequent UPDATE ends with a timeout. The only recourse right now is to ask my ISP to restart the daemon. Every field in the table is used in queries, so all the fields are indexed, including a primary.

I'm not sure what causes the initial lock, and my ISP doesn't provide enough information to diagnose the problem. They are reticent about giving me access to any settings as well.

In a previous job, I was required to handle similar information, but instead I would do an INSERT. Periodically, I had a script run to DELETE old records from the table, so that not so many records needed to be filtered. When SELECTing I used extrapolation techniques so having more than just the most recent data was useful. This setup was rock solid, it never hung, even under very heavy usage.

I have no problem replacing the UPDATE with an INSERT and periodic DELETEs, but it just seems so clunky. Has anyone encountered a similar problem and fixed it more elegantly?

Current Configuration

• max_heap_table_size: 16 MiB
• count(*): 4 (not a typo, four records!)
• innodb_buffer_pool_size: 1 GiB

Edit: DB is failing now; locations has 5 records. Sample error below.

MySQL query:

UPDATE locations SET x = "43.630181733", y = "-79.882244160", updated = NULL
    WHERE uuid = "6a5c7e9d-400f-c098-68bd-0a0c850b9c86";

MySQL error:

Error #1205 - Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction

locations
Field      Type         Null  Default
uuid       varchar(36)  No
x          double       Yes    NULL
y          double       Yes    NULL
updated    timestamp    No     CURRENT_TIMESTAMP 


Indexes:
Keyname    Type     Cardinality  Field
PRIMARY    PRIMARY  5            uuid
x          INDEX    5            x
y          INDEX    5            y
updated    INDEX    5            updated

回答1:

It's a known issue with InnoDB, see MySQL rollback with lost connection. I would welcome something like innodb_rollback_on_disconnect as mentioned there. What's happening to you is that you're getting connections disconnected early, as can happened on the web, and if this happens in the middle of a modifying query, the thread doing that will hang but retain a lock on the table.

Right now, accessing InnoDB directly with web services is vulnerable to these kinds of disconnects and there's nothing you can do within FatCow other than ask them to restart the service for you. Your idea to use MyISAM and low priority is okay, and will probably not have this problem, but if you want to go with InnoDB, would recommend an approach like the following.

1) Go with stored procedures, then the transactions are guaranteed to run to completion and not hang in the event of a disconnect. It's a lot of work, but improves reliability big time.

2) Don't rely on auto commit, ideally set it to zero, and explicitly begin and end each transaction with BEGIN TRANSACTION and COMMIT.

回答2:

transaction1> START TRANSACTION;
transaction1> SELECT * FROM t WHERE i > 20 FOR UPDATE;
+------+
| i |
+------+
| 21 |
| 25 |
| 30 |
+------+

---

transaction2> START TRANSACTION;
transaction2> INSERT INTO t VALUES(26);
transaction2> COMMIT;
transaction1> select * from t where i > 20 FOR UPDATE;

---

+------+
| i |
+------+
| 21 |
| 25 |
| 26 |
| 30 |
+------+

What is a gap lock?

1. A gap lock is a lock on the gap between index records. Thanks to this gap lock, when you run the same query twice, you get the same result, regardless other session modifications on that table.

2. This makes reads consistent and therefore makes the replication between servers consistent. If you execute SELECT * FROM id > 1000 FOR UPDATE twice, you expect to get the same value twice.

3. To accomplish that, InnoDB locks all index records found by the WHERE clause with an exclusive lock and the gaps between them with a shared gap lock.

This lock doesn’t only affect to SELECT … FOR UPDATE. This is an example with a DELETE statement:

transaction1 > SELECT * FROM t;
+------+
| age |
+------+
| 21 |
| 25 |
| 30 |
+------+

Start a transaction and delete the record 25:

transaction1 > START TRANSACTION;
transaction1 > DELETE FROM t WHERE age=25;

At this point we suppose that only the record 25 is locked. Then, we try to insert another value on the second session:

transaction2 > START TRANSACTION;
transaction2 > INSERT INTO t VALUES(26);
ERROR 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
transaction2 > INSERT INTO t VALUES(29);
ERROR 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
transaction2 > INSERT INTO t VALUES(23);
ERROR 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
transaction2 > INSERT INTO t VALUES(31);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)

After running the delete statement on the first session, not only the affected index record has been locked but also the gap before and after that record with a shared gap lock preventing the insertion of data to other sessions.

回答3:

If your UPDATE is literally:

UPDATE locations SET updated = NULL;

You are locking all rows in the table. If you abandon the transaction while holding locks on all rows, of course all rows will remain locked. InnoDB is not "unstable" in your environment, it would appear that it is doing exactly what you ask. You need to not abandon the open transaction.